In the coming days past, on top of a steep mountain, was encamped a horse with a horn, and a netbook that it was brave, crazy tied to your notebook ... (??!!).
Ahem, any resemblance to the ballad of "La Adelita" is pure imagination. But what I meant was that, in recent days, spread a minor scandal because a TV show where the "driver", a man named "Steve? Arce showed off his "professionalism" behave in that arrogant, rude and above all, "ignorantly" lout with a sexologist guest, which although usually done with many guests and even their partners, this time went beyond the issue of the "interview" (??!!).
Therefore, many students and even colleagues have asked me my opinion, and discussed the arguments for and against the "sexual normality." In the strictly scientific sense, it should first be defined what is meant by "normal" in this context, and then define "normal sex", which is not as simple as vulgar believe most indignant moral and members of our zoocie decentísimos ... forgiveness, Mexican society.
shocked not a question of something simply because the authorities "religious" or "political" or "social" saying that "it is written" (?!) That something is "bad." Have to prove it, but with evidence and reasoned conclusions, not just because they said some authority to another authority said that "this was told it was" ... under penalty of repeating the same mistakes and excesses of all such well-known historical (Franco's Spain, Nazi Germany, the "purges" Stalinist, Maoist agricultural tragedy, etc.).
And talking about the issue, we find an article, "Freedom and limits ", written by a professor at the Faculty of Sciences UNAM, Martín Bonfil, of the Directorate General for the Popularization of Science UNAM (published on his blog and "Milenio Diario") that exemplifies a scientific view of the matter, and which will advance some interesting fragments (students horned horse, here I leave, as we were):
"Maybe the gay marriages are, as the arbiter of moral , Onesimo Cepeda," a stupidity "( Milenio Diario, December 23 ). But if it is are stupid that homosexuals, like any other citizen, are entitled to make ... "
" And perhaps, as Carlos Marin ( Milenio Diario, January 8 ) the so Esteban Arce "have the right to express their homophobia" ... but do it in public, driving a TV show and "thought leader" (so sad is the cultural level of the average Mexican viewers) is incorrect because violates the rights of others ... "
" Esteban Arce disinformation: it expresses as true opinions contrary to current scientific knowledge , which shows that homosexual behavior is natural (makes very clear what Luis González de Alba in her column last Sunday, Milenio Diario, January 10 ) and "normal" in the sense that it is "sick" and that children raised by same-sex couples also are ... "
" Why choose the criteria based on scientific knowledge to those based on religious dogma? Among other things, because they are verifiable and verified: work. They are correctable if they fail, unlike the "truths" of the church. For something our Constitution (Article III ) for compulsory education "based on the results of scientific progress, and requires the same time that education remains" completely separate from any religious doctrine
"..." So, as I said in a briefing degenerated into a Byzantine discussion about the modern meaning of marriage and the theoretical existence of dark matter (??!!... I said it was "Byzantine", or empty, useless, futile), perhaps the problem in this country is NOT that there is no difference of opinion based on freedom of expression and beliefs in a respectful and fruitful, but NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING. The ignorance of "the way it should be" or "they say they said it was normal" or "I think the book says that ...", is what makes us more harm, and will, until there is a legitimate desire, as well BRAVE to go beyond our individual prejudices and fears with Courage and Valor open door sincere and neutral knowledge, which many times have we seen a Homeric work, worthy only of people of emergency or Heroes.
Y. .. I suppose very few will want to be heroes in these times ... or am I wrong?
soon, much more information and a change of concept in this, the driest place and unknown to the network, lol!
With a pro-scientific greetings, wishes you a good day,
the Inquirer Unicorn ... PD
And that I was angry for what he said the Maple Estebanito "Animal Insanity" ... but to take care of my cousins \u200b\u200bHorses and Zebras, and cast him the eye, lol! Greetings!
0 comments:
Post a Comment